Aug
25
What submission is not
Filed Under Christian Living, Culture, Family, Marriage, Men, Preaching | Leave a Comment
John Piper, from a sermon on 1 Peter 3:1-6 available at Desiring God Ministries, has listed six things that biblical submission is not. Time did not allow me to share these or elaborate on them at all in yesterday’s sermon on 1 Peter 3:1-7. Here they are:
What Submission Is Not
Here are six things it is not, based on 1 Peter 3:1-6.
1. Submission does not mean agreeing with everything your husband says. You can see that in v. one: she is a Christian and he is not. He has one set of ideas about ultimate reality. She has another. Peter calls her to be submissive while assuming she will not submit to his view of the most important thing in the world—God. So submission can’t mean submitting to agree with all her husband thinks.
2. Submission does not mean leaving your brain or your will at the wedding altar. It is not the inability or the unwillingness to think for yourself. Here is a woman who heard the gospel of Jesus Christ. She thought about it. She assessed the truth claims of Jesus. She apprehended in her heart the beauty and worth of Christ and his work, and she chose him. Her husband heard it also. Otherwise, Peter probably wouldn’t say he “disobeyed the word.” He has heard the word, and he has thought about it. And he has not chosen Christ. She thought for herself and she acted. And Peter does not tell her to retreat from that commitment.
3. Submission does not mean avoiding every effort to change a husband. The whole point of this text is to tell a wife how to “win” her husband. V. 1 says, “Be subject to your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives.” If you didn’t care about the Bible you might say, “Submission has to mean taking a husband the way he is and not trying to change him.” But if you believe what the Bible says, you conclude that submission, paradoxically, is sometimes a strategy for changing him.
4. Submission does not mean putting the will of the husband before the will of Christ. The text clearly teaches that the wife is a follower of Jesus before and above being a follower of her husband. Submission to Jesus relativizes submission to husbands—and governments and employers and parents. When Sarah called Abraham “lord” in v. 6, it was lord with a lowercase l. It’s like “sir” or “m’lord.” And the obedience she rendered is qualified obedience because her supreme allegiance is to the Lord with a capital L.
5. Submission does not mean that a wife gets her personal, spiritual strength primarily through her husband. A good husband should indeed strengthen and build up and sustain his wife. He should be a source of strength. But what this text shows is that when a husband’s spiritual leadership is lacking, a Christian wife is not bereft of strength. Submission does not mean she is dependent on him to supply her strength of faith and virtue and character. The text, in fact, assumes just the opposite. She is summoned to develop depth and strength and character not from her husband but for her husband. Verse five says that her hope is in God in the hope that her husband will join her there.
6. Finally submission does not mean that a wife is to act out of fear. V. 6b says, “You are her [Sarah’s] children, if you do good and do not fear anything that is frightening.” In other words, submission is free, not coerced by fear. The Christian woman is a free woman. When she submits to her husband—whether he is a believer or unbeliever—she does it in freedom, not out of fear.
Jul
30
Living grace: sermons of D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones
Filed Under Christian History, Christian Living, Preaching, Worship | Leave a Comment
D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, whose ministry touched thousands in the U.K. and helped revive publishing of Reformed literature and reprinting of the works of the English Puritans in the 1950s and 1960s, continues to influence thousands even nearly 30 years after his death. His recorded sermons are being re-edited into 25-minute broadcasts and podcasts. They are available in streaming audio, download or podcast subscription at oneplace.com.
Back in the late 80s and early 90s I used to borrow cassette recordings of Lloyd-Jones’ sermons from the old Mount Olive Tape Library in Mount Olive, Mississippi. I’ve been downloading the podcasts for two months now, and I continue to be impressed by the depth and simplicity of his preaching. I think you will also.
Jul
29
Brittle crazie glasse
Filed Under Poetry, Preaching, The Church | Leave a Comment
George Herbert (1593-1633) would walk twice a week across Salisbury Plain from his little parish at Bemerton to the great cathedral, where he delighted not only in the music, but also in the stained glass windows. He saw in them a metaphor for preaching.
THE WINDOWS.
LORD, how can man preach thy eternall word ?
He is a brittle crazie glasse :
Yet in thy temple thou dost him afford
This glorious and transcendent place,
To be a window, through thy grace.
But when thou dost anneal in glasse thy storie,
Making thy life to shine within
The holy Preachers, then the light and glorie
More rev’rend grows, and more doth win ;
Which else shows watrish, bleak, and thin.
Doctrine and life, colours and light, in one
When they combine and mingle, bring
A strong regard and awe: but speech alone
Doth vanish like a flaring thing,
And in the eare, not conscience ring.
Two notes:
- In the second stanza, the word ‘anneal‘ refers to the process of heating and then cooling glass to soften it and make it less brittle, and to fix the colors in the glass–a lovely image of sanctification.
- It felt good to hold my old Norton Anthology of English Literature, vol.1in my hands. Perhaps only English majors can understand.